Dane Amorosi
Selected work
Case study 05

Consequential automation

VPP Optimisation & Energy Sight

A staged-autonomy programme separating energy observation, analysis and simulation from any future physical command authority.

Challenge

Energy optimisation becomes consequential when recommendations connect to physical assets. Data freshness, tenant boundaries, simulation, authorisation and auditability matter before actuator access.

Dane’s role

Designed staged-autonomy programme direction, separating observation, analysis, simulation, validation and any future supervised or guarded control.

Programme design

  • Market-data observation and ingestion
  • Scoped multi-tenant data boundaries
  • Deterministic simulation and recommendation logic
  • Freshness and audit surfaces
  • Explicit separation between recommendations and physical command authority

Progression

  1. 01Observe
  2. 02Analyse
  3. 03Simulate
  4. 04Validate
  5. 05Supervised control
  6. 06Guarded automation

What this demonstrates

Safety-gated consequential automationDeterministic decision supportSimulation before controlAuthority separation

Next case study · 06

Vehicle Intelligence Service — From Requirement to Working Proof